Ronald van Genderen

Style risk is one of the key risks that sustainable investors need to be aware of. After all, many equity funds with a sustainable mandate tend to lean towards a growth style. Any choice of style brings the likelihood of it falling out of favour with investors over a period of time. So too this year’s growth style.

For emerging markets, the third quarter of this year was almost the exact mirror image of the second quarter. The MSCI EM index recorded an underperformance compared to the MSCI World index, mainly due to a solid loss for Chinese equities. In Latin America, some markets actually made up for second-quarter losses in the past three months. Meanwhile, the war in Ukraine continues to weigh on Eastern European markets.

The idea that sustainable funds will be more expensive than conventional funds due to the extra cost of sustainability research is not necessarily true. Both active and passive funds turn out to be cheaper. Sustainable funds are classified under European regulations into Article 8 and Article 9 funds. Within the latter category, we rank the cheapest options within global large-cap equity funds.

Eurozone value stocks are performing this year in a way not seen since 2016. Over the first eight months of the year, they actually achieved better returns than the broad market. Yet investors in funds that invest in such equities will have few reasons to celebrate.

Eurozone small-cap equity funds cannot exactly count on warm interest from investors. The assets under management are considerably lower than for funds within the European small-cap category, for example. Moreover, investors have been withdrawing money from the funds on balance for years. This year, this waning interest will not change given the mediocre performance over the first seven months.

After underperforming in the first quarter, the emerging markets index outperformed the MSCI World in the second quarter. This was entirely due to China, which ended the second quarter positively, while almost all other equity markets suffered significant losses.

Sustainability funds have been selling like hot cakes in recent years. Not surprisingly, many fund houses like to see their funds classified as Article 8 or 9 under the SFDR. After all, these are the funds where sustainability criteria play a role in the investment process. We provide an overview of the most popular equity funds within this group over the past 12 months.

With investors’ appetite for risk diminishing, equity markets are having a tough time this year. Despite a war raging on Europe’s external borders, European shares are holding up relatively well. However, this mainly applies to so-called large-caps, because shares of smaller companies are deeper in the red.

Investors have become increasingly risk-averse this year and have sold off shares worldwide. Rising inflation, falling economic growth, the prospect of interest rate increases and geopolitical tensions do not bode well for risky investments.

The introduction of the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation should enable investors to better assess investment funds on their sustainability merits. The framework divides the fund landscape into three groups, with so-called Article 9 funds designated as the most sustainable, or dark green funds. 

For emerging countries, the first quarter of 2022 was dominated by the war in Ukraine unleashed by Russia. Equities from Russia itself suffered particularly badly. Various index compilers, including MSCI, have removed Russian shares from all their regional indices. At a price of 0, the MSCI Russia index has suffered a loss of 100 percent this year.