Justin Doornekamp

In an uncertain geopolitical and macroeconomic environment, Iris van de Looij has recently taken charge of investment teams at InsingerGilissen, Quintet’s private bank in the Netherlands. The bank is currently in a slightly defensive mode, but sees scope to add some more risk to its portfolio again. 

While many asset managers continue to explore private investments amidst growing market uncertainties, Optimix Asset Management has consistently avoided them. “Investors don’t need private markets,”  said Jelte de Boer, managing director of Amsterdam-based Optimix, a Dutch subsidiary of Swedish bank Handelsbanken.

The dominance of the “Magnificent Seven” will diminish in 2024, leading to a more broadly oriented equity market next year. This is the expectation of equity experts. “There will no longer be seven next year,” they predict. On other themes, opinions are divided.

Banks in the Benelux are adopting Article 9 fund of funds to offer retail clients unlisted impact investments, despite concerns over high costs.

Laws and regulations make it difficult for parties to offer unlisted impact investments to retail clients. Banks in the Benelux see a solution in Article 9 funds of funds. “Customers are actually not waiting for it because of the high costs, but a fund of funds is desperately needed,” says Jan Willem Hofland, head of investment sales at Abn Amro MeesPierson.

Depositary banks, including some at Caceis, have been grappling with dissatisfaction for years due to the ever-complicating “settlement machinery” requiring constant fine-tuning. “With each legislative tightening, our processes must adapt,” state Rinke Visser and Sikko van Katwijk from Caceis Netherlands.

After a significant reclassification wave last year, many hesitate to award their funds the highest sustainability label, lacking the commercial upsides of SFDR 9 reporting.

Artificial intelligence could change the way ETFs are assembled. Why would an investor opt for traditional index trackers when they can be customized? Newcomers see opportunities, but the establishment remains skeptical.

SFDR Article 8 has become a ragbag of investments that can be both green and grey, several experts say. Fund houses offering Article 8 products do not seem to set the bar very high.  

While Article 8 products promote environmental or social features, they do not have a sustainable investment objective. While this does not detract from the fact that such products can still be green, fund houses do not seem very ambitious in their sustainability goals for Article 8 funds.

Natural disasters can have a severe impact on the real estate market, yet investors appear unaware of this looming risk. A correction in real estate stocks seems to be lurking.

Portfolio manager Lucas Vuurmans of Amsterdam-based investment bank Van Lanschot Kempen discussed this with InvestmentOfficer.nl. For the U.S. office market, a correction is anticipated due to climate risks averaging more than 3 percent. In riskier areas, the decline in value could even reach 10 to 12 percent.

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) framework’s Article 6 has often been perceived as a dumping ground for non-sustainable investments. However, experts question whether this perception is accurate. Some argue that an Article 6 fund can sometimes be even greener than an Article 8 fund.