sustainable finance

Europe’s asset management industry finds itself under a public magnifying glass after a team of international investigative journalists discovered that the most sustainable funds are still investing in polluting companies. Earlier warnings on possible reputation risks, also from specialists inside the sector, now echo loudly, but so does the observation that a lack of clarity in the current sustainability regulations poses significant challenges, both for the industry and investors.

A new set of rules - part of an update to the EU’s Mifid 2 directive - took effect in Luxembourg on Tuesday that will set out how banks and asset managers are required to handle their investment products in terms of Environmental, Social and Governance.

Morningstar and Investment Officer Luxembourg invite you to join us online on Thursday 1 December 2022 at 15 CET for the “Good Practices in ESG Reporting” interactive online debate. 

A panel of sustainable finance experts from financial institutions and authorities in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg will debate good practices in ESG reporting for investors and asset managers. 
 

The EU’s top category of sustainable investment funds - impact funds as defined under SFDR Article 9 - saw inflows double in the third quarter compared to the second, while funds that are considered mostly sustainable, or Article 8 ESG funds, continued to bleed, research insights by Morningstar show. The analysis also shows that more than 380 funds were reclassified during the third quarter.

Europe’s fund and asset management industry, seeing rapid growth in investor demand for sustainable products, is asking EU policymakers for a robust and transparent new legal framework that clearly defines how ESG and sustainability ratings for investment products are determined.

BlackRock finds itself caught in a tug of war in US politics over its approach to sustainable investing.

On the one hand, there are Republican-led states that believe the world’s largest asset manager is hostile to the carbon-focused industry. On the other hand, there are Democrat-led governments that believe BlackRock is backtracking on its commitment to addressing climate issues. 

The growing complexity of Europe’s sustainable finance framework and a lack of clear guidance from EU supervisors is leading to a fragmented application of the benchmark EU regulation that determines which investment funds are sustainable and which are not. As a result, the sector is facing what Morningstar’s top ESG expert calls “The Great Reclassification”.

When it comes to sustainability, all actors, including the finance sector, need to develop a suitable level of understanding before policies and investment strategies can translate into impact, explains Nicoletta Centofanti, head of the Luxembourg Sustainable Finance Initiative, in an interview.

This IO Talks Luxembourg podcast episode with Corrine Lamesch, chair of the Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry (ALFI), sheds light on the growing popularity of alternative investments in Luxembourg, addresses the complexity of ESG and sustainable finance regulation, and hears about the role of the grand duchy as a global distribution centre for financial products.

The European Union, under its taxonomy, requires SRI funds to declare what part of their portfolio is green by 1 January 2023, but there is still much work to be done to address the pitfalls in the EU’s sustainable finance framework, Triodos Investment Management’s Hadewych Kuiper and Nikkie Pelzer (photo) said in an interview. “Some asset managers prefer to classify their sustainable funds under Article 6” because it requires less reporting, making it cheaper.