Jeroen Blokland

A recession is what usually concerns many investors, and economists. But exactly how they estimate the probability of a recession is often unclear to me. And sometimes not much of the “approach” is correct either. Given the significant potential impact on different asset classes, it makes sense to attempt to get a grip on it myself.

The workings of financial markets never cease to amaze from time to time. Especially when they decide to systematically deny the elephant in the room. Equity investors are often blamed for this behaviour, but high-yield investors can also have some of it at the moment. 

If there is anything consensus after the demise of Silicon Valley Bank, it is surely that the outflow of bank deposits is leading to tighter lending requirements. Not least because loan-to-deposit ratios have increased.

This week, the European Central Bank published its ‘Monetary developments in the euro area’ report. And with that, we finally got information on bank deposits in the euro area.

European deposits look a lot better on an aggregate level than in America. Unlike in the United States, where bank deposits are down 3 per cent from a year ago, Eurozone deposits are still growing. That means the risks of traditional bank runs are lower here.

The Federal Reserve still raised interest rates by 25 basis points despite the banking woes. But not because it has high confidence that all will be well. Moreover, by not pausing once, it has again misled the market.

Little is more volatile than financial markets. One minute equity markets are stumbling over yet another mountain of additional interest rate hikes by central banks, the next we are waiting to see if those same central banks need to act to prevent another banking crisis.

Powell opens the door to a 50-basis-point rate hike, interest rates shoot up and equities crash. And yet, at the time of writing, the VIX index is below 20, raising the question of whether equities are not a bit complacent.

You can probably already hear a little from my tone what my answer is going to be. Still, there is a good reason why implied volatility looks relatively low.

My column last week, titled ‘Cash is king,’ showed that both cash and bonds are again competing with equities. After years of being saddled with TINA - There Is No Alternative - there again is something for investors to choose from.

Investing is a game of relative things, at least if you do it right. Whether you have a short or long horizon, somewhere the question arises as to which asset classes are actually the most attractive. And since central banks have made it a sport since 2008 to keep inflating their balance sheets, the answer to that question was rarely, if ever, cash. Until now!

I show two charts below that show the amount of ‘yield’ for the main asset classes, adjusted for duration (interest rate sensitivity) on the one hand and volatility on the other.

There you are with all those fancy indicators like yield curves, ISM Manufacturing, and housing markets. They all point in the same direction, down! But the incoming US macro numbers are in no way pointing to a recession, nor to a soft landing. Spend it!

The US economy created more than half a million jobs in January. That was almost three (!) times more than expected. Most importantly, such a job growth figure does not fit with a coming recession, but neither does it fit with a much hoped-for soft landing. On the contrary.

It indicates that the US labour market is still glowing even after 450 basis points of tightening.