SFDR Directive

As Europe seeks ways to address greenwashing, supervisors have proposed broad reforms to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regime (SFDR). To enhance transparency, they propose stricter labelling. Together with the addition of a transition investing category, these changes could redefine sustainable investing.

A recent update of a Luxembourg sustainable finance report notes that two-thirds of the assets under management of Luxembourg UCITS – 2.8 trillion euros at the end of June 2023 – report under one of the two designations set out by European rules for green investing. However, mention of investment-related greenwashing is conspicuous by its relative absence in the report.

Fund selectors are by no means in pause mode around the introduction of the next level of sustainability regulation, now that SFDR level 2 has been postponed by six months. They are busy collecting data, against a background of seemingly increasing complexity, according to responses to Fondsnieuws from chief operating officer Monique Molenaar-Vader of IBS Capital Allies and chief investment officer Kees Verbaas of Altis Investment Management.

2021 was the third year in a row where sustainable investors outperformed non-sustainable investors. For a long time, there has been a debate as to whether sustainable investment comes at the expense of returns or actually generates additional returns. Many studies and meta-studies later, the cautious conclusion is that it probably does not cost a return and may even be good for the return.

PGIM Investments has seen the assets under management in its UCITS fund range in Europe double from 4.8 to 9.6 billion US dollars in the past 1.5 years. This increase is mainly due to new inflow and to the fact that the American asset manager, as an active house, charges competitive fees.