Enable NewsXML
Off
Test email addresses
andjenie.mohan@investmentofficer.com
jip.schoon@investmentofficer.com
redactie@investmentofficer.com
lenneke.arts@investmentofficer.com
Newsletter News ID
6f8e9eb854
Newsletter best of the week id
bb4e83f4e9
Newsletter partner id
ed6d22b6c0
Newsletter research id
1661028bcf
Key
fr
Languages
fr
Newsletter time
7:30

The profit paradox

For decades, it was an iron law for investors: in the long run, the stock market follows economic growth. A thriving economy translated into rising corporate profits and thus higher share prices. But anyone who has watched the past thirty years closely senses a growing friction with this old wisdom.

Nuclear revival in Europe mainly benefits the US

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a multibillion-dollar deal last week with the US for the construction of a series of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). Although the so-called “nuclear renaissance” is also taking shape in Europe according to investors, they see American companies as the main beneficiaries.

Morningstar: PIMCO and Robeco in Global Corporate Bonds (EUR Hedged)

Eurozone corporate bonds delivered a return of 4.2 percent over the past twelve months (as measured by the Morningstar Eurozone Corporate Bond Index), while their US counterpart, the Morningstar US Corporate Bond Index, lost 1.8 percent in euro terms. The currency effect was crucial here.

Pensions: the missing link in European venture capital

Pension funds represent a strategic reservoir to finance innovation and the climate transition in Europe. Despite estimated assets of 2.7 to 3.55 trillion euro, their exposure to venture capital remains marginal: barely 0.1 percent of portfolios, according to a study published by European Women in VC, Pensions for Purpose and Venture Connections.

Critics fear EuroPension repeats mistakes that doomed PEPP

Europe’s pensions supervisor is relaunching the failed Pan-European Personal Pension Product under a new label, EuroPension. Critics warn the project risks repeating past mistakes: too complex to compete with low-cost ETFs, too weak to rival national schemes, and too focused on capital markets at the expense of statutory pensions.